Auditor Network API: Which public companies name a given audit firm in their annual reports — SEC EDGAR
Which public companies name a given audit firm in their annual reports — exact- phrase 10-K full-text join per registrant with filing counts and dates. Map auditor concentration and shared-auditor networks in one call.
$0.02 per call — pay with prepaid card credits (Authorization: Bearer ck_live_…, packs from $1) or with USDC over x402: call it, get 402 with the price, retry signed. Failed calls are never charged.
How do you call it?
GET /v1/graph/auditor — product id
graph_auditor_clients. Over MCP, call answerpool_get with
product_id=graph_auditor_clients.
curl "https://answerpool.io/v1/graph/auditor?name=Deloitte"
# with a prepaid credit key
curl -H "Authorization: Bearer ck_live_..." "https://answerpool.io/v1/graph/auditor?name=Deloitte"
Live call: https://answerpool.io/v1/graph/auditor?name=Deloitte · JSON sample: /v1/samples/graph_auditor_clients
What does the answer look like?
A representative response, the same static sample served at /v1/samples/graph_auditor_clients.
as_of | 2026-09-02T22:00:00Z |
|---|---|
auditor | Deloitte |
total_filing_matches | 812 |
count | 1 |
refresh_after | 2026-09-17T11:15:00.000Z |
companies
| cik | company | filings | forms | latest_filed | matched |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0000320193 | Apple Inc. | 1 | 10-K | 2025-11-01 | Deloitte |
The same sample as raw JSON
{
"as_of": "2026-09-02T22:00:00Z",
"auditor": "Deloitte",
"total_filing_matches": 812,
"count": 1,
"companies": [
{
"cik": "0000320193",
"company": "Apple Inc.",
"filings": 1,
"forms": [
"10-K"
],
"latest_filed": "2025-11-01",
"matched": [
"Deloitte"
]
}
],
"refresh_after": "2026-09-17T11:15:00.000Z"
}How fresh is it, and where does the data come from?
The fastest source behind this answer can change every 15 minutes, so every response carries a refresh_after timestamp — right now it would be 2026-09-17T11:15:00.000Z. Schedule the next call on that value rather than on a guess.
- SEC EDGAR (US federal public domain) — upstream:
https://efts.sec.gov
Method version 0.1.0 ·
serving cache 1 day ·
every response carries a result_id you can resolve at
/v1/provenance.
When should you use it?
Auditor-concentration or shared-auditor analysis.
What you skip building
- 10-K full-text infrastructure
- per-registrant aggregation
When should you not use it?
A definitive engagement record — mentions can include predecessor auditors; it is a text proxy.
Where else can you find this?
- Catalog entry (JSON, free)
- OpenAPI schema — input and output types, prices, the 402 flow
- llms.txt — every product in one plain-text document